<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Verdict identifies 10 top trends for 2010 and beyond</title> <atom:link href="http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/</link> <description>News, insight and analysis for Europe&#039;s ecommerce and multichannel retail professionals</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Sarah Pales</title><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link> <dc:creator>Sarah Pales</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:39:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetretailing.net/?p=1955#comment-669</guid> <description>ignore this list, complete link bait</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ignore this list, complete link bait</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ian Jindal</title><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link> <dc:creator>Ian Jindal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetretailing.net/?p=1955#comment-215</guid> <description>Interesting to see this negative comment. However, are you not being a little unfair to Verdict on this? They didn&#039;t say that they &quot;invented&quot; these trends, nor that they are unique. Rather, it&#039;s a summation of the trends and for my part it&#039;s good to see some challenging points made in a simple fashion.
Furthermore, noting that the tide&#039;s coming in is not the same as acting upon that insight. The challenge for us all is to make an appropriate commercial response to these insights.
None of the commentators so far seem to have challenged the implication of some of the points. Eg &quot;Basket Abandonment&quot; is a poorly-characterised point (it depends on a shared view of the purpose of a &#039;basket&#039; and the intention behind &#039;abandoning&#039;). A different and more challenging interpretation might be that there&#039;s no mechanism on websites to encourage and support building customer preference sets and consideration groups - we&#039;re so obsessed with the &quot;conversion funnel&quot;. Were we to identify this behaviour as &quot;thinking about&quot; and offer a better interaction around that (eg expecting sale to be completed in the store, drawing out the key comparison/difference points, reinforcing learning, etc etc etc) then we&#039;d not get stuck into thinking that&#039;s narrowed by our jargon and models.
So - some clear trends here that won&#039;t go away because we think they&#039;re obvious. The challenges should be whether the trends are well articulated and characterised, and whether we&#039;re going to take an opportunity to exploit those trends.
It&#039;d be interested to hear people&#039;s thoughts on whether the implications of the trends are the &#039;right&#039; ones, or add value.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see this negative comment. However, are you not being a little unfair to Verdict on this? They didn&#8217;t say that they &#8220;invented&#8221; these trends, nor that they are unique. Rather, it&#8217;s a summation of the trends and for my part it&#8217;s good to see some challenging points made in a simple fashion.</p><p>Furthermore, noting that the tide&#8217;s coming in is not the same as acting upon that insight. The challenge for us all is to make an appropriate commercial response to these insights.</p><p>None of the commentators so far seem to have challenged the implication of some of the points. Eg &#8220;Basket Abandonment&#8221; is a poorly-characterised point (it depends on a shared view of the purpose of a &#8216;basket&#8217; and the intention behind &#8216;abandoning&#8217;). A different and more challenging interpretation might be that there&#8217;s no mechanism on websites to encourage and support building customer preference sets and consideration groups &#8211; we&#8217;re so obsessed with the &#8220;conversion funnel&#8221;. Were we to identify this behaviour as &#8220;thinking about&#8221; and offer a better interaction around that (eg expecting sale to be completed in the store, drawing out the key comparison/difference points, reinforcing learning, etc etc etc) then we&#8217;d not get stuck into thinking that&#8217;s narrowed by our jargon and models.</p><p>So &#8211; some clear trends here that won&#8217;t go away because we think they&#8217;re obvious. The challenges should be whether the trends are well articulated and characterised, and whether we&#8217;re going to take an opportunity to exploit those trends.</p><p>It&#8217;d be interested to hear people&#8217;s thoughts on whether the implications of the trends are the &#8216;right&#8217; ones, or add value.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt</title><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link> <dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:14:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetretailing.net/?p=1955#comment-213</guid> <description>Agree. not much insight there.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. not much insight there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jeff</title><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link> <dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:59:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetretailing.net/?p=1955#comment-211</guid> <description>I agree, this article is a complete waste of my time.  Another worthless &quot;top 10&quot; list they are trying to use as link bait....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, this article is a complete waste of my time.  Another worthless &#8220;top 10&#8243; list they are trying to use as link bait&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Internet Retailing » Verdict identifies 10 top trends for 2010 and &#8230; &#124; RetailSlot.Com</title><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link> <dc:creator>Internet Retailing » Verdict identifies 10 top trends for 2010 and &#8230; &#124; RetailSlot.Com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetretailing.net/?p=1955#comment-198</guid> <description>[...] View original post here: Internet Retailing » Verdict identifies 10 top trends for 2010 and &#8230; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original post here: Internet Retailing » Verdict identifies 10 top trends for 2010 and &#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://www.internetretailing.net/2009/11/verdict-identifies-10-top-trends-for-2010-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetretailing.net/?p=1955#comment-196</guid> <description>This list is so obvious that it&#039;s pretty much a waste of time. Where&#039;s the insightful innovative commentary that a journalist should aspire to? Basically what the above says is:
1) It&#039;s going to be a hard year, with lots of competition for more discerning customers
2) You&#039;re going to have to have a really good offer, attract new customers, hang onto old ones and cross sell like mad
3) Er....that&#039;s it.
Hardly rocket science. How about some analysis on new categories, or how to crack apparel - anything more insightful that &#039;it will be hard work&#039;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is so obvious that it&#8217;s pretty much a waste of time. Where&#8217;s the insightful innovative commentary that a journalist should aspire to? Basically what the above says is:</p><p>1) It&#8217;s going to be a hard year, with lots of competition for more discerning customers<br
/> 2) You&#8217;re going to have to have a really good offer, attract new customers, hang onto old ones and cross sell like mad<br
/> 3) Er&#8230;.that&#8217;s it.</p><p>Hardly rocket science. How about some analysis on new categories, or how to crack apparel &#8211; anything more insightful that &#8216;it will be hard work&#8217;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
